- From: <Black_David@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:54:10 -0500
- To: fielding@gbiv.com, uri@w3.org
> In fact, skipping through the rest of the spec indicates that RFC 2434 > is completely absent (it should be a normative reference) and the remaining > document needs to incorporate its terminology for policies -- that should > cut the length and make it much easier for IANA to review and apply. Speaking of that, the provisional registration process is currently First Come First Served (anyone can register anything). Shouldn't it at least be Expert Review so that there's an opportunity for someone clueful to catch "big picture" issues about consistency of new schemes with the rest of the world? The RFC resulting from this draft would then be the guidance that the expert reviewer would be expected to follow (and in turn establish a minimum expectation for quality of what can be registered). Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ----------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:54:19 UTC