- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:12:38 -0500
- To: Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
Charles Lindsey scripsit:
> Or is it the intention that historic entries should be 'invisible'. I.e.
> that the existence of a historic foobar scheme does not prevent the
> simultaneous registration (even permanent) of a (possibly very different)
> foobar scheme.
I certainly hope not. The gopher scheme may be little used today, but
that doesn't mean that some future scheme should be so called. There
is a sufficiency of [a-z]+ strings.
--
"Clear? Huh! Why a four-year-old child John Cowan
could understand this report. Run out cowan@ccil.org
and find me a four-year-old child. I http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
can't make head or tail out of it." http://www.reutershealth.com
--Rufus T. Firefly on government reports
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 18:12:40 UTC