W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > February 2005

RE: New URI registration draft; significant changed

From: Dave McAlpin <Dave.McAlpin@epok.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:05:25 -0500
Message-ID: <1636C74D3A020E4781DC433A4D901D957987C1@empire.dc.epokinc.com>
To: "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>
Cc: <uri@w3.org>

I think I expected something stronger, like advice that the scheme's
syntax should be defined in terms of both 3986 and 3987. I imagine
future schemes including an appendix, possibly non-normative, with ABNF
based on 3987 for applications that natively support IRIs. I just
wondered if it was too early to offer that as a best practice.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LMM@acm.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:56 AM
To: Dave McAlpin
Cc: uri@w3.org
Subject: RE: New URI registration draft; significant changed

> Should best practices with respect to internationalization be 
> revisited now that RFC 3987 is available?

Do you think section 2.5 is adequate?

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-gui
deli
nes-03.txt

or

http://larry.masinter.net/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines-03
.htm
l#charguide


-- 

Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.305 / Virus Database: 266.3.0 - Release Date: 2/21/2005
 
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 18:05:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:35 GMT