W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > August 2005

RE: XMPP IRIs: feedback requested

From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:14:12 -0700
To: "'Peter Saint-Andre'" <stpeter@jabber.org>
Cc: uri@w3.org
Message-id: <0ILN002XW47VLA@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com>

Maybe we should address this in the URI scheme registration
document--that schemes could be defined in terms of "IRI" syntax,
using RFC 3987 rules to transform them to URI syntax.

Right now, the guidelines don't really mention that as
a possibility. 

Even so, it should still be called a "URI scheme", even
if it is defined using "IRI syntax".

Looking at RFC 3920, does the xmpp URI scheme assume
that you're using the TCP binding? Would there be a different
scheme for a binding that uses polling over HTTP?
Is the "xmpp" scheme only for XMPP version 1.0, or is
the version negotiated independently?

Received on Monday, 22 August 2005 20:14:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:09 UTC