W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > May 2004

Re: RFC2396bis wording, opinions?

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 16:50:56 -0700
Message-Id: <DCE858BE-B101-11D8-B766-000A95A51C9E@textuality.com>
Cc: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, uri@w3.org, "'Tim Berners-Lee'" <timbl@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
On May 28, 2004, at 4:34 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

>       This document doesn't limit the scope of what might be a 
> resource;
>       rather, the term "resource" is used in a general sense for 
> whatever
>       might be assigned a URI for the sake of later identification.

Suggestion 1: s/later//
Suggestion 2: s/ for the sake of later identification//

I think at least #1 is required, since it might already have had the 
URI assigned.  But really I think that in this context, the whole 
phrase beginning "for the sake of..." is superfluous. -Tim

Received on Friday, 28 May 2004 19:50:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC