W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > May 2004

Re: RFC2396bis wording, opinions?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 04:38:44 -0400
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Cc: uri@w3.org, 'Tim Berners-Lee' <timbl@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Message-ID: <20040528083844.GC1340@homer.w3.org>


Flogging away at the _new_ text seems a more productive 
use of time. I think it's nearly there. There's still a slight hint 
that having at least one URI is a requirement on resource-hood, 
but apart from that it's a vast improvement.


Received on Friday, 28 May 2004 04:38:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC