At 17:19 04/05/13 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote: >At 14:20 13/05/04 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote: >>Hello Graham, >> >>I have added the text that you propose below, and appended the >>following: >>The grammar is split into two parts, rules that differ from >>[RFC2396bis] because of the above-mentioned expansion, and rules >>that are the same as in [RFC2396bis]. For rules that are different >>than in [RFC2396bis], the names of the non-terminals have been >>changed as follows: If the non-terminal contains 'URI', this has >>been changed to 'IRI'. Otherwise, an 'i' has been prefixed. >> >>I have tentatively closed this comment. > >I think that's fine. Thanks. Thanks. I have closed this issue. Martin.Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2004 04:55:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:34 GMT