W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > March 2004

Re: info scheme has no authority component, why?

From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <rden@loc.gov>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:11:53 -0500
Message-ID: <008a01c40ad2$2452e9c0$849c938c@lib.loc.gov>
To: <uri@w3.org>


From: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
> In effect, then,
> the authority component of LCCNs is "lccn".
>
Good. Then info *does* have an authority component. Its the info
namespace (see info scheme bnf at
http://info-uri.info/registry/docs/misc/faq.html#what_is_the_bnf )

--Ray

Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 16:11:56 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: info scheme has no authority component, why?"
Previous message: jcowan@reutershealth.com: "Re: info scheme has no authority component, why?"
In reply to: jcowan@reutershealth.com: "Re: info scheme has no authority component, why?"
Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: info scheme has no authority component, why?"
Reply: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: info scheme has no authority component, why?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC