W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > March 2004

Re: fragment prose proposal

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:50:33 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040308134024.0261d0f0@127.0.0.1>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: uri@w3.org

At 13:55 08/03/04 +0100, Patrick Stickler wrote:

>On Feb 27, 2004, at 20:23, ext Graham Klyne wrote:
>
>>... I'm not sure that it is at all meaningful to employ a fragment 
>>identifier at all.
>
>I've come to the same conclusion.

I'm concerned that I have been quoted out-of-context.  My original message 
containing that quote is at:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2004Feb/0148.html

Specifically, the quoted phrase was prefixed with:
   "In such an environment, "
(referring to an environment in which "a given URI has no retrievable 
representation")

On reflection, I'd change the "at all" to "especially", and note that the 
comment should be interpreted in light of:
   http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/#pr-describe-resource

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Monday, 8 March 2004 09:17:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:32 GMT