W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > July 2004

RE: BOF Request for URIREV04

From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:35:49 -0700
To: "'Tim Kindberg'" <timothy@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, hardie@qualcomm.com
Cc: "'sandro hawke'" <sandro@w3.org>, "'tim Kindberg'" <timothy@hpl.hp.com>, agenda@ietf.org, "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@gbiv.com>, uri@w3.org
Message-id: <0I1900BYBYRQFS@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com>

> > 2.  Revise "Guidelines for URI schemes" (RFC 2718)
> >   Update "vnd and prs Trees"
> >       draft-king-vnd-urlscheme-03.txt
> >   Discussion of problematic schemes.
> >   (Ted Hardie)
> Could you clarify the meaning of "problematic" -- for whom: the 
> registrants experiencing the IETF's processes, or the IETF, 
> the W3C, or a combination of those? Will 'tag' be included?

My goal was to have an open discussion about why some
schemes seemed to be controversial or difficult,
and what the nature of the problems might be. I would
hope to avoid any significant discussion of any individual
scheme, except perhaps as an example.

Received on Thursday, 22 July 2004 18:42:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC