W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > February 2004

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-black-snmp-uri-02.txt

From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:23:06 +0100
Message-Id: <BEE2780F-58C0-11D8-9299-00039384827E@greenbytes.de>
To: <uri@w3.org> <uri@w3.org> <uri@w3.org>

Am 06.02.2004 um 17:00 schrieb Shigeru Aoki:

>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-black-snmp-uri-02.txt
> Although the syntax of snmp_URI allows text string context in the 
> authority
> part of the URI, RFC2396bis doesn't allow text string context in there.

Correct. RFC 2396 did allow it, but 2396bis does no longer. The proposed
snmp URI scheme looks almost like a hierarchical uri, but as you noted 
differs significantly.

I'm in no way fluent on SNMP, but it would seem prudent to either go the
"opaque way" and use another character than '/' for separating 
or go the "hierarchical" way and shift the engine/context parts into the
path part of the uri.

One simple way could be the usage of query parameter or always treat
the first two path segments as engine/context identifier with a defined
constant for default values.

Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 11:25:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC