W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Relative URI or relative URI reference

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:33:40 -0700
Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, uri@w3.org
To: "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive@demon.net>
Message-Id: <2037F472-F145-11D8-A2AE-000393753936@gbiv.com>


> Then there should be a clear comment *at that point* that there are no 
> such
> things as Relative URIs, and why the rule hasn't been renamed.

Which would be false because there are such things as Relative URIs.
They just aren't URIs.

....Roy

Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2004 18:33:26 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Elliotte Rusty Harold: "Re: Relative URI or relative URI reference"
Previous message: Clive D.W. Feather: "Re: Relative URI or relative URI reference"
In reply to: Clive D.W. Feather: "Re: Relative URI or relative URI reference"
Next in thread: Elliotte Rusty Harold: "Re: Relative URI or relative URI reference"
Reply: Elliotte Rusty Harold: "Re: Relative URI or relative URI reference"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:46 GMT