At 11:26 09/08/04 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>> http://example.com:80/ >> >>I think this is the same as http://example.com/ according to RFC2396bis, >>but that you have to climb someway up the equivalence ladder >>(protocol-specific equivalence) to recognize this. It must be expected >>that many software packages would not recognize this equivalence. > >It is the same, but that is under scheme-specific normalization, not >protocol. It is the "http" that defines :80/none equivalence, not HTTP. I stand corrected. I didn't notice that subtlety. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#ContactReceived on Tuesday, 10 August 2004 11:51:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:25 GMT