- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:39:08 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
At 08:01 27/09/03 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > I do still feel that opportunities to correct widely-held > misperceptions about > > character & encoding-related concepts & terminology should not be > squandered, > > if retention of said misconceptions makes the spec more difficult to > > understand or detracts from its usefulness and implementability. But > whatever. > > Never mind. > >Yes, well, I think lots of people would like to clear that sort >of thing up. But finding the right words isn't easy. FWIW, I found the W3C character model can be helpful (though maybe rather XML-centric in some places; despite that, the underlying model is very generally applicable)... http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/ #g -- ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Monday, 29 September 2003 06:09:22 UTC