Re: uddi scheme (and informal scheme indexes)

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 12:51, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 11:47, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >  From http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes.html:
> > 
> > [[[ This is (an attempt at) an exhaustive list of URI schemes. We try 
> > to list them all, whether they're standard or not.
[...]
> I'm inclined to retire the page and say "please
> let uri@w3.org know about any schemes you find,
> and try to get their authors to register officially".

I did in fact retire it today.
$Revision: 1.91 $ of $Date: 2003/09/11 22:32:28 $

> Another possibility is add something like
> "Good URIs don't use UnregisteredUriSchemes"
> to the wiki topic http://esw.w3.org/topic/GoodURIs
> and collaborate on why UnregisteredUriSchemes
> is an AntiPattern.

I started that going... see
  http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes
and the 83 subtopics from the old list, plus the
2 new ones: doi and uddi
  http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes_2fdoi
  http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes_2fuddi

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/