At 9:46 AM +0300 10/15/03, Patrick Stickler wrote: > There is nothing that > the info: URI scheme offers that the http: URI scheme does not provide, > yet there is much that the http: URI scheme offers that the info: > scheme does not provide and which is IMO very important for the SW. > > Patrick http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/There http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/are http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/many http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/cases http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/where http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/the http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/use http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/of http://www.openly.com/sw/words/geek/http http://www.openly.com/sw/words/geek/uris http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/is http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/completely http://www.openly.com/sw/words/english/innapropriate http://www.openly.com/sw/punctuation/%2E http://hellman.net/eric/ http://just.kidding/Received on Thursday, 16 October 2003 12:53:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:45 GMT