Re: uri, urn and info

On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 11:49, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > So the authors of the 'info' scheme are telling the LOC that once it has
> > registered the 'lccn' scheme below 'info' that it cannot then register
> > it as its own top level URN NID?
> 
> Well I'd put it this way: the authors of 'info' aren't planning to register
> lccn without LC approval. And if lccn goes that way, LC is not going to then
> register lccn as a urn nid.

So the next question becomes:

Why would LOC consider registering LCCN below 'info' as opposed to a
full URN NID?

-MM