- From: Michael Mealling <michael@neonym.net>
- Date: 15 Oct 2003 12:05:10 -0400
- To: "Ray Denenberg, Library \"of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
- Cc: uri@w3c.org
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 11:49, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > So the authors of the 'info' scheme are telling the LOC that once it has > > registered the 'lccn' scheme below 'info' that it cannot then register > > it as its own top level URN NID? > > Well I'd put it this way: the authors of 'info' aren't planning to register > lccn without LC approval. And if lccn goes that way, LC is not going to then > register lccn as a urn nid. So the next question becomes: Why would LOC consider registering LCCN below 'info' as opposed to a full URN NID? -MM
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 12:05:23 UTC