From: "Michael Mealling" <michael@neonym.net> > In other words: urn:info:lccn IS NOT EQUIVALENT to urn:lccn and never > should be. I don't follow you. Nobody is suggesting that lccn be registered as both a urn namespace and an info namespace. --RayReceived on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 11:18:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:45 GMT