On 2003-10-03 07:22, "ext Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org> wrote: > Patrick Stickler wrote: >> I don't see why all of the above cannot be addressed using >> http: URIs. > > We might need a language with more than one concept. > > Larry Don't misunderstand my statement above as meaning we don't need URI schemes other than http:. My statement was specifically with regared to the stated goals of the info: and urn: schemes, which IMO can be fully met by http:. PatrickReceived on Friday, 3 October 2003 06:38:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:24 GMT