While having some sympathy with Patrick here, I note that a new scheme that is URIs not URLs neatly sidesteps the car/document problems. An info URI identifies a concept not a document about that concept. A similar http URL would be taken as identifying either or both depending on who you talk to. Jeremy Hammond, Tony (ELSLON) wrote: >>Why define and manage the URI space outside the scope of the core Web >>and SW machinery? >> > > > Hi Patrick: > > I have to query the question you put above. IMO the "info" URI scheme fits > full square within the core Web and SW machinery as articulated in the > latest Web Architecture Draft: > > Architecture of the World Wide Web > W3C Working Draft 27 June 2003 > > http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ > > The domain of URI is more extensive than HTTP alone. I would assert that the > actual domain of URI is the Web.Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2003 07:48:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:24 GMT