- From: by way of Martin Duerst <Israel_Viente@il.vio.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 14:03:46 -0500
- To: uri@w3.org
Hi, 1) Which RFC should I follow in case of file URIs 2396 or 1738 ? 2) About the escaping of ':' separator of the drive letter. I understood there is no need to escape the ":". But is "<file:///e%3a/xxx.pdf>file:///e%3a/xxx.<file:///e%3a/xxx.pdf>pdf" also valid ? 3) Relative file URIs : Is it equivalent to use "./foo.pdf" or "<file:/./foo.pdf>file:/./foo.<file:/./foo.pdf>pdf" or "<file:///./foo.pdf>file:///./foo.<file:///./foo.pdf>pdf" ? Are the last 2 examples which uses scheme name and relative form , invalid URIs ? Thanks in advance Israel
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:03:53 UTC