Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The following is a proposal for an alternative solution > meeting the goals of urn: URIs but with http: URIs so > that the full richness of the web architecture can be > exploited. > > (sincerest apologies to all the folks who have worked long > and hard on DDDS... perhaps now to no avail) I don't think the DDDS folks will be too worried about this. But if you insist on going forward, then: http://urn.X.Y/ is a sufficient hack. It also doesn't require inventing new points of failure in the web architecture*, doing DDDS badly, or the costs of dealing with ICANN and whoever provides this service. Bill de hÓra * As for the full richness of the web archiecture, think about how the provider would scale this service. - I suspect purl works because not many people use it.Received on Monday, 7 July 2003 05:21:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:44 GMT