On Saturday, June 7, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > I think that's an improvement. A small suggestion for your > consideration: > > s/efficient/effective/ > > (The rationale is to steer slightly away a possible implication that > this is simply a performance issue.) It is simply a performance issue. > I also noticed the double negative is harder to read, so maybe: > [[ > Therefore, unreserved characters should not be escaped unless the URI > is being used in a context that forbids such characters to appear. > ]] Sounds good to me. ....RoyReceived on Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:59:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:44 GMT