W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Rationalizing the term URI

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:49:07 +0100
To: <uri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKEDEGFAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>


Hi.

Are we really comfortable with the fact that after "clarifying" the term URI
we get a situation where "URI" and "absoluteURI" do *not* differ in that
"absoluteURI" is the set of a URIs that happen to be absolute?

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 08:49:38 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: Rationalizing the term URI"
Previous message: Tim Bray: "Re: URI References and context of use"
Maybe in reply to: Tim Berners-Lee: "Rationalizing the term URI"
Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: Rationalizing the term URI"
Reply: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: Rationalizing the term URI"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:31 GMT