Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> 1. The document inconsistently uses both URI and URIs as the plural of >> URI, sometimes within a sentence or two of each other. ... > > This issue was supposed to be fixed in draft 00. Could you be more > specific > about which ones you think are wrong in draft 00? Just to be sure, I'm looking at http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html, I hope that's the right text. The abstract uses the "URI" form of plural in its second paragraph; a quick re-look reveals ony "URIs" nearby, maybe I was reacting to a singleton; I gather this is purely editorial, I'll keep a sharp eye open next time I do an end-to-end on this. -TReceived on Tuesday, 25 February 2003 22:39:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:05 UTC