W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Resources and URIs

From: by way of Martin Duerst <dan@tobias.name>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:37:57 -0400
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20030429113753.059de870@localhost>
To: uri@w3.org




On 29 Apr 2003 at 15:30, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:

 > > My understanding of his view is that http: URIs can only name
 > > documents, unless they're URIrefs containing # in which case they
 > > can name things of any kind.
 >
 > Well, I'm also familiar with Tim's recent arguments along these
 > lines, though I think he is in this case in a pretty small minority.
 >
 > If URIs can denote anything, then one need not use a URIref to
 > denote something that is not a "web document".

I don't really understand why anybody ought to use "http:" URIs to
denote anything other than the document dereferenceable via that URI
and the HTTP protocol.  That seems to be asking for confusion.  Why
not use a different URI scheme if one needs URIs to denote non-
dereferenceable entities such as persons or organizations?

--
Dan
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 11:38:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:31 GMT