At 05:35 PM 2003-04-23, pat hayes wrote: >[ PS. Here is my suggestion for an alternative introductory text. It >probably needs wordsmithing. > >"This document specifies the syntax of URIs, which are a form of global >identifier used in Web protocols and languages. Particular uses of URIs, >and their intended meanings in various contexts, are described in other >specifications. In general, the entities referred to or identified by URIs >when used in Web contexts are called "resources"., but this document does >not specify the nature of resources or to restrict resources to any >particular category of entities." > >and leave it at that. Nothing else at all about resources, no examples, >no discussion. This is good. Can anyone show a dependency of the [software] engineering specification of URI[s] on a definition of 'resource' or 'Resource'? Failing that, we should not say anything that smells like a definition, because a restrictive clause suggests a requisite and substantive restriction. AlReceived on Thursday, 24 April 2003 11:44:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:44 GMT