W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2003

Re: resources, stuffs and individuation

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:13:11 -0500
Message-Id: <p05210609bacccdcdd658@[10.0.100.12]>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
Cc: uri@w3.org

>>... so how about "a resource is anything that can be referred to".
>
>It is synonymous with "a resource is anything that can be identified",

That wasn't my intent. One may be able to refer without identifying, 
which was part of the point. Also, I know what 'refer' means much 
better than I know what 'identify' means. It carries less baggage.

>which creates a circular definition of URI,

Whats wrong with circular definitions? At this level of generality, 
its almost inevitable for definitions to be mutually recursive.  It 
might be better just to not give definitions at all, however.

Pat

>something which was corrected
>in response to a complaint in the prior review cycle that resulted in
>the current definition.
>
>....Roy


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 19:13:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:31 GMT