On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 16:35, pat hayes wrote: [...] > [ PS. Here is my suggestion for an alternative introductory text. It > probably needs wordsmithing. > > "This document specifies the syntax of URIs, which are a form of > global identifier used in Web protocols and languages. Particular > uses of URIs, and their intended meanings in various contexts, are > described in other specifications. In general, the entities referred > to or identified by URIs when used in Web contexts are called > "resources"., but this document does not specify the nature of > resources or to restrict resources to any particular category of > entities." > > and leave it at that. Nothing else at all about resources, no > examples, no discussion. Yes, that works for me. > This follows a dictum: when something is highly controversial, don't > try to get it right, just don't say it. And it tacitly admits what is > the actual case, which is that its up to the world in general to > decide what URIs are *actually* going to mean.. So the least said, > the better.] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 18:41:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:44 GMT