At 11:30 AM 7/14/02 -0400, Al Gilman wrote: >At 12:53 PM 2002-07-13, Larry Masinter wrote: > > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0169.html > > > >These look like interesting possible additions to the URI specification. > >Interesting, if one could tell what they meant. Al, I don't think the purpose of including these definitions would be to give complete instructions for URI handling in all situations, but to help all readers (and writers) of URI-related documents to be in broad agreement about the terms they use. Hence: > >URI Resolution: > > The process of determining the access mechanism and > > appropriate parameters necessary to dereference a > > URI. e.g. in the case of an HTTP URI, this process > > resolves the URI into an IP address, a port number, > > a host name (possibly optional) and a request URI. > > > > Resolution may require several iterations. > >The access mechanism is not necessarily unique. [...] I don't think that harms the definition as given. > >URI Dereference: > > The process of using the access mechanism and > > parameters generated by URI resolution to create, > > inspect or modify resource state. > >The nature of the desired operation may be implied >by the URI itself or may be determined by the context >in which the URI-reference is found. [...] Ditto. > >URI Retrieval: > > The use of URI dereference to retrieve > > representations of resource state. > >This language is circular. Retrieval is to retrieve. >But what is that? OK, I suggest: [[ URI Retrieval: The use of URI dereference to obtain representations of resource state. ]] >And the 'create' and 'modify' cases would seem to >call for terms parallel to this 'inspect' version. I think retrieval is a common enough case to deserve special mention. >The whole discussion is unfortunately tainted with network >communication residues. Tainted? The web is predicated on network communication, no? #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 19:07:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:42 GMT