W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Some recent Internet Drafts relating to URIs

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:26:20 +0200
To: Michael Mealling <michael@neonym.net>
CC: URN <URN-IETF@LISTS.NETSOL.COM>, URI <uri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B86C574C.BBCE%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>


>> What is the merit of this over the 'data:' scheme?

It's actually interesting (IMO) to note that a 'data:' URI
is in fact a URV (and hence URP) as it is never dereferenced,
but provides a complete, self-contained representation of
a resource. It is a WYSIWIG URI.

Thus the URV classification of 'data:' is far more accurate
regarding its semantics and application than the current URL
classification.
 
Cheers,

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 03:25:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:30 GMT