W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2002

RE: new 'duri'/'tdb' draft sent to internet-drafts editor

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:16:22 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F192A70@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Larry Masinter'" <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: uri@w3.org
Hi Larry,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Masinter [mailto:masinter@adobe.com]
> Sent: 02 April 2002 16:59
> To: 'Williams, Stuart'
> Cc: uri@w3.org
> Subject: RE: new 'duri'/'tdb' draft sent to internet-drafts editor
> If you look you'll see a non-normative reference
> to RFC 2550. 

Entertaining and informative :-)

> It isn't necessary to add a separator between
> year and the rest of the date to allow the date/time to be
> expressed to arbitrary precision.

Ok... but the syntax in RFC2550 does stray a little beyond 4 (decimal) digit
years in the duri/tdb draft.

I still think pivoting around a simple separator - which could be absent in
dates between 0000 and 9999 would be simpler and cleaner.

> I didn't want to make RFC 2550 a normative reference, however,
> because it's in that "special" Informational RFC category.


> Larry

Anyway... I guess I'll sleep soundly whether or not the date syntax is
revised... (and my children and... )


Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 08:16:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:04 UTC