At 02:02 PM 9/25/01 -0400, Michael Mealling wrote: >Again, are you sure? The IANA may not be the registry for these items >in the future. The IANA is simply the organization that the IETF/ISOC >has contracted with to provide that service now. Depending on the state >of politics it may not be so in the future. > >IMHO, urn:ietf:params:media-type:text-plain > >is much better.... I'll agree this is much better. A couple of (solvable) problems with that format: * Ability to map that back into "text/plain", since most systems that deal with media types use this form as the internal representation. * Ability to express parameters ("text/plain; encoding=flowed") Is that addressed in the IDs? RobReceived on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 14:44:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:41 GMT