W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > September 2001

RE: Request For A Formal URN Namespace: "geo"

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 23:06:29 -0400
Message-Id: <200109100243.WAA9639623@smtp2.mail.iamworld.net>
To: "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <urn-ietf@lists.netsol.com>
Cc: <uri@w3.org>
At 03:54 PM 2001-09-09 , Larry Masinter wrote:
>I wouldn't want to see the "geo" URN scheme choose a
>different representation than the geopriv working group,
>at least without some analysis and justification.
>

I'm pretty sure that altitude is undefined without specifying what model you
are using for the shape of the zero altitude surface.  Latitude could show
similar effects.

The documents of the Open GIS Consortium might help, here.  [Google that]

Al

>Larry
>--
><http://larry.masinter.net/>http://larry.masinter.net
>  
Received on Sunday, 9 September 2001 22:43:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:29 GMT