W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Two questions about URIs

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:57:58 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101029b7f2241d5011@[205.160.76.193]>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: uri@w3.org
>Pat Hayes wrote:
>[...]
>>  This seems to imply a three-way distinction with two mappings, rather
>>  than the simple two-way name/entity distinction suggested by the term
>>  'resource identifier'. A URI identifies (denotes?) a resource, which
>>  in turn has some *content* (the entities to which it currently
>>  corresponds):
>>
>>  URI ----(identifies)---->resource-----(corresponds to)----->entity
>>
>>  Apparently the identification mapping is fixed, but the correspondence
>>  mapping can change with time.  Is this a fair understanding of this
>>  text?
>
>Yes.
>
>>  If so, the entire notion of a URI simply denoting or naming
>>  something seems to need re-thinking.
>
>Why? The three way relationship is hardly new or novel:
>
>	object identifiers / objects / object state
>	scheme variable identifiers / variables / values

Not in the context of machine states and programming languages, no. 
In a general-purpose ontological model for all of human knowledge, it 
does require a little more thought. Since (I have been told) a 
resource can be anything, I am not sure what kind of general notions 
of 'state' or 'corresponds' can be used in such a very general 
setting.

>  > I request clarification of what this is supposed to mean, with
>>  particular reference to the intended distinction between 'resource'
>>  and 'entity', and between 'identifies' and 'corresponds to'.
>
>In the HTTP spec...

I meant in general. This passage is about resources in general, not just http.

Thanks for the feedback.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 13:57:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:29 GMT