W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > November 2001

Re: RFC2518 (WebDAV) / RFC2396 (URI) inconsistency

From: Piotr Kaminski <piotr@ideanest.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:30:49 -0800
Message-ID: <004001c17329$723f77e0$ada15018@gv.shawcable.net>
To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <uri@w3.org>
Patrick Stickler proposed:
> My proposal was specifically:
>    URI ::= scheme ":"
>    URI ::= "urn"  ":" <NID> ":"
> The first case is not a valid URI for the scheme, but is a valid
> URI denoting the scheme. The second case is not a valid URI for
> the URN namespace, but is a valid URI denoting the URN namespace.

How about a URI scheme for URI schemes?  Something like:


and, of course,


This would let everybody refer to URI schemes in the same way, and doesn't
need any changes in grammar or interpretation for current standards.  The
disadvantage being that it introduces yet another scheme...

        -- P.

  Piotr Kaminski <piotr@ideanest.com>  http://www.ideanest.com/
  "It's the heart afraid of breaking that never learns to dance."
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 02:39:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:03 UTC