uri@w3.org from May 2001 by date

Tuesday, 15 May 2001

• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? by way of Martin Duerst

Monday, 14 May 2001

• Re: Goodbye, Douglas Adams Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? Graham Klyne
• Goodbye, Douglas Adams [was: Are URI...] Dan Connolly
• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? Dan Connolly

Sunday, 13 May 2001

• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? Aaron Swartz

Friday, 11 May 2001

• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? Dan Connolly
• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Are URI-References bound to resources? Dan Connolly
• Are URI-References bound to resources? Aaron Swartz

Tuesday, 8 May 2001

• More URI Schemas by way of Martin Duerst

Monday, 7 May 2001

• Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs Michael Mealling
• Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs Michael Mealling
• Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs Michael Mealling
• Re: URIs: Identifiers in name, but... Aaron Swartz

Friday, 4 May 2001

• Re: Should tags be URNs? (was Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Tag Time Issues Aaron Swartz
• Re: Should tags be URNs? (was Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs) Tim Kindberg
• Re: Should tags be URNs? (was Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Should tags be URNs? (was Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs) Tim Kindberg
• Re: Should tags be URNs? (was Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs) Tim Kindberg

Wednesday, 2 May 2001

• Re: URIs: Identifiers in name, but... Sean B. Palmer
• URIs: Identifiers in name, but... Al Gilman
• Re: Should tags be URNs? (was Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs) Al Gilman

Tuesday, 1 May 2001

• Re: Should tags be URNs? (was Re: Proposal: 'tag' URIs) Michael Mealling

Last message date: Monday, 14 May 2001 22:14:46 UTC