EM: and PRES: schemes proposed

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 12:30:51 -0500
To: uri@w3.org
CC: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
Message-ID: <39C6514B.91B3CBA4@w3.org>

I'll add this to http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes
when I find time; but for now, I'll just archive
it here in uri@w3.org.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Forwarded message 1

From: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 15:10:53 +0100
Subject: Re: Namespace squatting: please don't
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000918150715.00b37ae0@pop.dial.pipex.com>

>(see http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes#mid).

Dan, interesting resource.

You might be interested that IM: and PRES: are proposed in 
<draft-mrose-impp-common-00.txt> for instant message inbox and presence 
respectively.

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)

Received on Monday, 18 September 2000 13:32:44 UTC