- From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 10:01:41 -0400
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Cc: "Paskin, Norman (DOI-ELS)" <n.paskin@doi.org>, uri@w3.org
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:49:45AM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > However, I believe Leslie means to cover only those URI > things that are governed by RFCs, which at least is a tractable problem > (even though it was the same problem that sidetracked the old URI WG for > over three years). I think we can do this simply because we now have some knowledge and experience under our collective belts. If we constrain that entire document to just that then its very doable. LDAP is doing the same thing right now with going through the literally dozens of LDAP RFCs and making a statement about what is 'core' and what isn't. I think Leslie has it right, possibly with that additional comment about applicatiions being allowed to further contrain the definitions of what they consider Resource or URIs and that the reader should consult those as well. -MM -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Mealling | Vote Libertarian! | www.rwhois.net/michael Sr. Research Engineer | www.ga.lp.org/gwinnett | ICQ#: 14198821 Network Solutions | www.lp.org | michaelm@netsol.com
Received on Monday, 4 September 2000 10:11:58 UTC