- From: by way of <djz@corp.webtv.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:28:00 +0900
- To: uri@w3.org
Agreed. We were a little careless in our terminology (as others also pointed out), and I just haven't gotten around to revising the drafts. Dan --------------------------------------------------- Dan Zigmond Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies WebTV Networks, Inc. djz@corp.webtv.net --------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LM@att.com] Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 10:33 AM To: uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org Subject: "lid" URLs (someone) wrote me: > I've just noticed a couple of Internet drafts that propose and refer to a > URI scheme called lid: > > draft-blackketter-lid-00.txt > draft-finseth-isanlid-00.txt > > I have two thoughts: > > (a) these lid:'s look more like URNs to me > > (b) the lid draft claims that lid:'s are simulatneously URIs and URNs, but > they don't conform to URN syntax (in not having a leading "urn:" or > namespace identifier parts). I don't have a problem with URL-schemes that have URN-like semantics, since there are enough of them already (cid, news, etc.). I think the wording (saying that lid URLs are URNs) probably needs to change, since it just adds confusion. Larry
Received on Sunday, 16 April 2000 23:04:08 UTC