W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > June 1999

RE: oh no... please... not two lists...?

From: Weibel,Stu <weibel@oclc.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 14:23:25 -0400
Message-ID: <E5353CDF1EBBD011A3B70000F863124102D85737@oa4-server.dev.oclc.org>
To: URN-IETF@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET, uri@w3.org
I guess what I am suggesting is that URN-IETF and URI@w3.orf have
overlapping objectives and, judging from the traffic, could be conflated.  

And yes,  I agree with the other sentiments expressed... need for open
discussion, etc.

stu


-----Original Message-----
From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf@swip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 1:48 PM
To: Weibel,Stu; URN-IETF@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET; uri@w3.org
Subject: Re: oh no... please... not two lists...?


At 11.35 -0400 1999-06-02, Weibel,Stu wrote:
>The W3C seems exactly the right place for these discussions to be carried
>forward and archived.

Where the mailing list is run doesn't matter at all for the IESG. So, 
it is neither better, nor worse to run it at W3C.

Regarding two lists, you might mix up the URN-discussions list and 
the URI discussion list. Both lists were hosted at Bunyip, but thy 
are still different. They are both belonging (or was regarding the 
URI mailing list) to IETF working groups.

   paf
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 1999 14:23:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:25 GMT