- From: Karen R. Sollins <sollins@lcs.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 16:22:51 -0400
- To: peterd@bunyip.com
- Cc: uri@bunyip.com
Hi Peter, 'Tis many a slip, 'tween the cup and the lips... [ I wrote: ] . . . } Depending upon how we do it, I think dereferencing does } mean we need a human friendly part for when humans must } select these things. For dereferencing, we obviously want } to focus on the mechanical processing capabilities and } might be willing to sacrifice readibility here if it makes } it work. I of course meant to say ""For **comparison**, we obviously want to focuse on the mechanical processing capabilities..." Sorry if this caused any confusion... - peterd Not a problem - actually, I also expect that most of the job of dereferencing had better be mechanical too, so I had no problem with your statement. Karen
Received on Monday, 26 June 1995 16:22:11 UTC