- From: <weibel@oclc.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 1995 09:20:11 -0400
- To: uri@bunyip.com
> I wrote: > > > Let me answer this with a question. Can you think of an example of a > > > service that should _in_principle_, *not* be replicable? > Note the in principle bit. I think this was missed in the heat of the > response. > Stu wrote: [ a bunch of irrelevant stuff *blush*] Sorry to have cluttered the list with my response to a question that wasn't really asked. stu
Received on Friday, 7 July 1995 09:20:18 UTC