Re: Predraft of a new URL scheme: mailmsg

I think we've been over this, and it's the main reason for the
'security considerations' section.

We already had this with

gopher://whitehouse.gov:25/HELO%20host.com%0cMAIL%20from:<sucka>RCPT%20to:<president>%0f...

etc. case. URL interpreting agents need to be careful, and
descriptions of URL schemes need to point out all of the pitfalls so
that URL interpreting agents don't fall into them.

Received on Tuesday, 3 January 1995 20:32:18 UTC