- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@hal.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 1995 13:53:05 -0600
- To: ietf-lists@proper.com (Paul Hoffman)
- Cc: uri@bunyip.com
In message <v02110104ab5eafb4ab1b@[165.227.40.30]>, Paul Hoffman writes: > >mailserverurl = "mailserver:" encoded822addr "/" subject "/" body Why not use the existing name for this piece of functionality: mail-server as per MIME (rfc1521)? I suggest that whenever possible, the name space of URI schemes and MIME external body access types should conicide. Perhaps URIs will supercede MIME external-body references. But why make up a new name for functionality that already exists? Dan
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 1995 14:59:37 UTC