- From: Jim Conklin <conklin@info.cren.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 15:10:13 +0100
- To: "Karen R. Sollins" <sollins@lcs.mit.edu>, uri@bunyip.com
At 11:21 AM 8/21/95 -0400, Karen R. Sollins wrote: >Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something, but it seems to me that >dangling references (whether they are URNs or URLs or anything else) >will always have validity in some cases. ... Thanks, Karen, for such a nice explanation of why we'll always have to deal with unresolvable URL's and URN's! I've been bothered by what appreared to me a the unreasonable assumption that we shouldn't have such things, and I realy like your explanation and example of why that assumption is false. Jim
Received on Monday, 21 August 1995 15:07:38 UTC