So this PCA stuff http://www.cs.princeton.edu/sip/projects/pca/ is based on this ELF thing http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/lfcsreps/91/ECS-LFCS-91-162/ So I'm trying to read the ELF paper. I can't parse the formulas. In partuclar, the B-KIND-SIG rule on page 7... second premise. It seems to say K is a kind in \sigma but this doesn't match any of the assertion forms on the previous page: \sigma is a valid signature \gamma is a valid context in \sigma K is a kind in \gamma and \sigma A has kind K in \gamma and \sigma M has type A in \gamma and \sigma Help? Do they imply an empty \gamma in their notation or something? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 14 April 2000 02:03:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 19 August 2005 11:10:28 GMT