W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > sw99@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: Issues list - delayed message

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 20:36:05 -0400 (EDT)
To: Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
cc: timbl@w3.org, sw99@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0004062034230.16436-100000@tux.w3.org>


If not a bug, a glitch. If you're saying that xml:lang values are
similiar to datatypes, I agree. Some literal may have a type
(eg. foo:floatPoint) and/or an xml:lang. This does clash with the model's
insistence that literals can't have properties though...

dan

On Thu, 6 Apr 2000 Ora.Lassila@nokia.com wrote:

> Regarding the xml:lang, I don't think it is a bug. I always thought that it
> would be a characteristic of the string (the literal value), and since M+S
> did not really address primitive data types, it wouldn't have to be
> concerned of xml:lang either.
> 
> How do we propose adding it? As a qualification of the actual property
> value?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	- Ora
> 
> --
> Ora Lassila, <ora.lassila@nokia.com>
> Research Manager
> Agent Technology, Nokia Research Center / Boston
> +1 (781) 993-4603 (please note new email & phone number!)
> 
> 
> > ----------
> > From: 	EXT Tim Berners-Lee
> > Sent: 	Thursday, April 6, 2000 20:20
> > To: 	sw99@w3.org
> > Subject: 	Issues list - delayed message
> > 
> > (I found this in a window I had not gotten around to pressing send on)
> > ______________________________________________________
> > 
> > Danbri,
> > 
> > 
> > Kudos for getting going on this.
> > 
> > It is good to give credit where credit is due for issued, and not always
> > jut
> > to point to the director as well!
> > 
> > - XML lang not being in the model  was brought up by Sergey
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Jan/0053.html
> > Thoiugh that suggests adding itto the model rather than removing it from
> > th
> > esyntax.
> > Folks,xml:lang is not represented in the RDF model according to RDF M&S
> > 1.0,
> > which is IMO a bug in the specs.
> > 
> > 
> > - The issue of Alt, Bag and Seq being searated out from the basic model is
> > brought up in
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0115.html for
> > example.
> > 
> > 
> > - Issue: need for "poorest man" serializeion
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0115.html
> > As a next step I'd like to have a "poorest man" RDF/XML
> > serialization:<rdf>
> >   <triple subject="[URI]" predicate="[URI]" object="[URI]"/>
> >   <triple subject="[URI]" predicate="[URI]">[PDCATA]</triple>  ...</rdf>
> > 
> > 
> > These may not be the first occurrences.  But I think all the issued I
> > pulled
> > out I pulled out of previous messages.  pointers to the first raising we
> > can
> > find would be a godo idea.
> > 
> > As regards state, I think we can do a broader categorization.
> > 
> > - Bug fix, propose for 1.1  (ml lang, some reference issues?)
> > - Simplification (like removing PICS bits, aabouteachprefix, lang, etc).
> > Doesn't affect other features => wait to see if IG wanst tto start an
> > action
> > to do them
> > - Syntax change which can be done back-compatibly with existing syntax =>
> > suggest trials with software.
> > 
> > Or something like that. Then we concldue, there are only 2 bugs and there
> > is
> > a consensus for a version 1.5, but we need to work on x and y at teh IG
> > level. O
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2000 20:36:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:02:51 UTC