- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 20:20:19 -0400
- To: <sw99@w3.org>
(I found this in a window I had not gotten around to pressing send on) ______________________________________________________ Danbri, Kudos for getting going on this. It is good to give credit where credit is due for issued, and not always jut to point to the director as well! - XML lang not being in the model was brought up by Sergey http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Jan/0053.html Thoiugh that suggests adding itto the model rather than removing it from th esyntax. Folks,xml:lang is not represented in the RDF model according to RDF M&S 1.0, which is IMO a bug in the specs. - The issue of Alt, Bag and Seq being searated out from the basic model is brought up in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0115.html for example. - Issue: need for "poorest man" serializeion http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0115.html As a next step I'd like to have a "poorest man" RDF/XML serialization:<rdf> <triple subject="[URI]" predicate="[URI]" object="[URI]"/> <triple subject="[URI]" predicate="[URI]">[PDCATA]</triple> ...</rdf> These may not be the first occurrences. But I think all the issued I pulled out I pulled out of previous messages. pointers to the first raising we can find would be a godo idea. As regards state, I think we can do a broader categorization. - Bug fix, propose for 1.1 (ml lang, some reference issues?) - Simplification (like removing PICS bits, aabouteachprefix, lang, etc). Doesn't affect other features => wait to see if IG wanst tto start an action to do them - Syntax change which can be done back-compatibly with existing syntax => suggest trials with software. Or something like that. Then we concldue, there are only 2 bugs and there is a consensus for a version 1.5, but we need to work on x and y at teh IG level. O
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2000 20:19:51 UTC