W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > svg-testsuite-comments@w3.org > March 2006

pseudo classes

From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:56:52 +0000
Message-Id: <AEA6DFCA-D8F2-4A7C-AD9F-C91829C66546@btinternet.com>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
To: svg-testsuite-comments@w3.org

pseudo classes


where are the pseudoclass tests in the SVG 1.1 testsuite?

2005-07-21: "I have also added pseudoclass tests to the SVG 1.1  

I can't find them :-( sorry and

thanks again

Jonathan Chetwynd


bz, I agree that it couldn't get much clearer, that the a element is for
hyperlinks and thus, is a link, and thus, :link and :visited apply.  
However, I
am happy to add words to the spec saying so explicitly if this really  
unclear. (Its actually more unclear for :hover, where some  
implementors seem to
think it only applies to links).

ih, yes, XLink 1.0 does indeed require xlink:type="simple" and yes, a  
the DTD really does men it can't take any other value and yes, XML  
does not
require fetching the external DTD subset for non-validating parsers.  
This is
being fixed in XLink 1.1, which explicitly states that unless a link is
explicitly stated to be some other type, its of type simple. jc, jw,  
ds, that
should address the verbosity and existing content concerns.

I have also added pseudoclass tests to the SVG 1.1 testsuite.
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 10:57:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:33 UTC